Before I got a blocking warning by firefox (current of ubuntu 16.04), that strangely disappeared without any changes on the server and I can at least access the site.
URL/Domain invalid. Please go back and verify the secure URL.
So at least with that site I can't verify any issues.
So I'd like to know why the ownership is shown like mentioned above and why the site might be blocked because of it. I checked some resembling issues but never found an applying answer. An answer to the issue with whynopadlock.com would be great additional.
I don’t see something unusual with the certificate. The issue with whynopadlock seems to be a mistake in entering a correct url. What exactly did you enter there?
For my webmin installation I get at least a result shown, the meaning and solution are still miracles for me and I'd appreciate some help there too:
Domain Name: barlians.com
URL Tested: https://barlians.com:10000
Number of items downloaded on page: 11
SSL verification issue (Possibly mis-matched URL or bad intermediate cert.). Details:
ERROR: cannot verify barlians.com's certificate, issued by '/C=US/O=Let's Encrypt/CN=Let's Encrypt Authority X3': Unable to locally verify the issuer's authority.
As explanation: For webmin I always chain the certificates in one file, that's common procedure in webmin and described in the FAQ: FAQs | Webmin -> "My browser complains about the Webmin certificate when in SSL mode"
This just means you do not have an extended validation (EV) certificate that supplies information about who owns the site. You'll notice Firefox says the same thing about the certificate for www.google.com.
I see the same issue for your website, but I cannot say why there is an error. Besides, what did you want to test with that tool? If you have a green icon or at least not a yellow one next to the website's address in firefox, everything is fine.
Your configuration for webmin to use LE’ SSL Certs should look as follows, and also make sure your /etc/hosts is configured correctly with your IP address and the hostnames you are using.
@Patches
Thanks, the point with google.com is quite interesting and calming me down a bit.
Concerning the webmin-page I will check, but I’m quite sure that I did it right.
@bytecamp
I saw the test-site mentioned on another page and wanted primary mention that I checked with that tool already to shorten some ways of thoughts, but then I got the unexpected result.
Thanks, I see that page the first time. or at least recognize that it’s related to webmin itself.
Curious if I can forget then about combining certificates manually …
Will check it out!