Bought licence but is shown as Not Applied

[Osiris]

@griffin

Charging for support for LE certificates is fine, but I believe that charging for LE certificates themselves is a violation, especially since LE owns the certificates it generates.

I thought I read in a recent thread that it's not prohibited to ask for money for a Let's Encrypt certificate issuance. Which words you use to make it legally sound is IMO less important. Ownership or issuance, the net effect is the same

Edit:
Hm, I think I had Could Let's Encrypt be used for commercial purpose? in my head, but that doesn't make it very clear.

Point is, you could ask money for a one-time issuance without a change of ownership.. And again for a second one. Are you then charging for the certificate itself? Or for the "support", even if you charge per certificate? You might be able to legally justify this per certificate cost in that customers issuing more certificates should also pay more than customers NOT using certificates. Sounds fair, right?