ARI experiences and suggestions submitted to IETF

[mholt]

Hi,

I finally wrote a letter to the IETF working group about ARI:

[Acme] Practical concerns of draft-ietf-acme-ari

It's a little intimidating writing to groups like this, and I hope it's received alright. My hope is to bring to light some experiences I've had as a client developer implementing ARI, and some concerns/issues/questions, both practical and conceptual. I also tried to accurately summarize a few other threads from these forums. Hopefully I was able to communicate them clearly and effectively.

In it, I recommend two alternative approaches to ARI.

If any ACME client developers would like to participate, I'd certainly welcome that.

(Note that IETF WG MLs are not my forte.)

[petercooperjr]

Thank you very much for taking the time to write all that up; and phrasing everything much better than the rant that I would probably have made.