Interesting that it is working for you. I only have Firefox and Chrome at hand and even after clearing data and restarting them I continue to get my issue. Probably another case of these two degrading
Your server is responding to the ClientHello message with
02 50
02 - Fatal error
50 - Decode error
A message could not be decoded because some field was out of the
specified range or the length of the message was incorrect. This
message is always fatal and should never be observed in
communication between proper implementations (except when messages
were corrupted in the network).
The server running wiki.xmlab.org appears to be running Debian Lenny. Lenny went EOL in 2012 - over 6 years ago, and only ever received OpenSSL 0.9.8.
No modern TLS client will sent a ClientHello that is compatible with the OpenSSL package on that server, which is why you receive the fatal error. (Though I may be mistaken here, because I still can't connect even when using SSLv2/SSLv3).
Edit: Another more likely theory I have is that your Apache server is configured with protocols and ciphersuites, none of which is provided by the server's ancient version of OpenSSL, so the TLS connection instantly fails due to lack of compatible protocols.
I was thinking the same but I can't connect using ssl3 too... but keep in mind that apache conf for this virtualhost is denying SSLv3 so maybe you are not too far from the real problem
Thanks at all for your replies. This is awesome. You all rock! This helped me guessing what the issue could be.
First of all: The server holding the VirtualHost for βwiki.xmlab.orgβ is a Debian 8, moreover Apache is run on port 443. So the server should be fine.
As a matter of fact if I do not redirect βwiki.xmlab.orgβ to βwww.xmlab.orgβ the page is being served fine, i.e. without any issues and I even get a Qualys A+ rating. Since the issue only started after βwww.xmlab.orgβ switched to https I now come to believe that all the issues originate from the server serving βwww.xmlab.orgβ which I do not control. I do not even know their setup so they might be using antedeluvian software.
Probably the issue is that I require more security with my redirect I configured that the server I am redirecting to can handle. So I will now configure a much less secure redirect and see what will happen
What is utterly irritating in my theory is that the browsers emits issues for βwiki.xmlab.orgβ whereas the issue is originating and to find at βwww.xmlab.orgβ.
My bad, sorry for wasting your time. I was fooled by this and should have known better .
That's very curious about the redirects. They shouldn't affect each other in any way.
Your site (wiki.xmlab.org) still fails to establish a TLS session though, independently of any redirects (t fails before the server even knows what the HTTP request is).
I believe that jmorahan is on the money. nginx that is configured to listen on port 443 without any certificates can also alert in this way.
You can confirm by checking who is actually bound to 443 (despite Apache being configured for 443, nginx may be fighting for it, which could also explain why it worked for an intermittent period (possible between service restarts)):
. I have another theory (Iβm really sorry, tell me if you want to stop).
I think your web host may be intercepting all traffic on port 443 in that subnet and redirecting it to their own nginx server.
My evidence to support this is that the entire 217.160.223.0/24 subnet (which your server belongs to) responds with an HTTP 400 nginx banner if you send a plain-text HTTP request on port 443, in the exact manner as your server, with the exact TLS alert bytes (02 50) as your server.
So my theory has proven wrong. Even adding an βoldβ configuration does not make the error go away.
Your theory sounds good to me however it does not make a lot of sense from my perspective. I have the same configuration for many other domains on the same server where it is working. The only difference in this case is that the domain I am redirecting to is on a different server.
In the end I could not be bothered any longer. The original aim was to take the sub domain off the air. As an extra the redirect would have been nice but this is not imperative to me. It would have been nice to get things rolling here but in the end it does not seem to be a LE issue anyways and the time put into it by all you cool guys and me is no longer justifiable.