Can anyone provide a source for the repercussions of removing this single non-compliant TLSv1.1 cipher please?
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA : Good configuration TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA : Good configuration TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA : Good configuration TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA : Good configuration TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA : Non-compliant with PCI DSS requirements
I really don’t want to remove it and find out later that a whole class of browsers can no longer access our website…
TIA!
@mushu, a quick way to check would be to remove it temporarily and then run the SSL Labs scan against your site, which simulates browser compatibility and will give you a report about browsers that are expected to be compatible.
(I’m sure there’s other documentation about this somewhere, though.)
I thought of that (the ol’ helpdesk classic “shut down a service in order to see who cries about it”) but unfortunately this is Windows and requires a server reboot each time the ciphers are modified because, yep, they’re stored in the Registry and only read once at startup. Ugh.
I have not seen anything that specifically requires TLSv1.1
However, “TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA” is NOT specific to TLSv1.1 - it can also be used by TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.2.
So, that changes your question (in my mind) to: What are the repercussions of removing “TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA” cipher?
That would depend entirely on your client base and no one outside your organization would be able to know that for certain.
You could take steps to determine if that cipher is even being used, and if so, by which devices (IPs).
You could ensure the server enforces cipher prefence order and move 3DES down to last.
Then ensure your web logs include the cipher in use.
Then simple filter through the logs for lines with 3DES.
From there you can make an more educated decision about the possible repercussions.
Ahh. Great idea to log the cipher! I've already disabled TLSv1.0 and SSL2/3 entirely so there's that. Plus, it is literally the very last cipher in the server list so will be the last one tried. I can't remember why I kept it in, I think because we still need to support IE 8 unfortunately. So perhaps that's my answer...appreciate the discussion!