Please fill out the fields below so we can help you better. Note: you must provide your domain name to get help. Domain names for issued certificates are all made public in Certificate Transparency logs (e.g. https://crt.sh/?q=example.com), so withholding your domain name here does not increase secrecy, but only makes it harder for us to provide help.
My domain is: hattertech.com
It produced this output:
You have an existing certificate that has exactly the same domains or certificate name you requested and isn't close to expiry.
What would you like to do?
1: Keep the existing certificate for now
2: Renew & replace the cert (limit ~5 per 7 days)
Select the appropriate number [1-2] then [enter] (press 'c' to cancel): 2
Renewing an existing certificate
Congratulations! Your certificate and chain have been saved at:
Your key file has been saved at:
Your cert will expire on 2021-04-17. To obtain a new or tweaked
version of this certificate in the future, simply run certbot
again. To non-interactively renew all of your certificates, run
If you like Certbot, please consider supporting our work by:
My web server is (include version): (NA)
The operating system my web server runs on is (include version): Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
My hosting provider, if applicable, is: Self.
I can login to a root shell on my machine (yes or no, or I don't know): yes
I'm using a control panel to manage my site (no, or provide the name and version of the control panel): no
The version of my client is (e.g. output of
certbot --version or
certbot-auto --version if you're using Certbot): certbot 0.31.0
In outlook 2013 I keep getting "The target principle name is incorrect". Viewing the cert from Outlook shows:
Issued To: ubn004
Issued By: ubn004
This is the actual hostname the server postfix runs on.
Web searches suggest changing the SMTP server in outlook to whatever the "Issued By" on the cert says. Clearly that is not an option because the SMTP server is "mail.hattertech.com"
How can I get certbot to change the issued to / issued by? Or am I completely off base here?