I'm not aware of any providers -- us included -- sharing explicit answers to either of your questions.
That said, there's an easy way to answer your second question for any given provider: see if they provide a Replay-Nonce header alongside their Directory resource. For example, https://dv.acme-v02.api.pki.goog/directory comes with a Replay-Nonce header. Since that's an unauthenticated GET request, the nonce cannot possibly be bound to an account.
That is right. However, independently of that a nonce provided in the header of an answer for an authenticated request might be bound to the account making the authenticated request.
An ACME client service that is multiplexing requests from different accounts and treating the nonce global might terribly fail when connecting such ACME server. Who is the culprit, then?
So I tend to see the way that the RFC must be precise about the scope of a nonce.
There was a nonce related issue long time ago. A client intermixing the connections over IPv4 and IPv6 went to different data centers of Let'sencrypt. The scope of the nonce was per data center:
isn't there few things that need a nonce outside of account context? (create new account/revoke by private key for example) I don't think ACME server can use account specific nonce: