How did they become identical?
They're not supposed to be.
How did they become identical?
They're not supposed to be.
another question
i got cert for dsrlearn.com and *.dsrlearn.com wildcard with SAN
if i use DNS CAA issuewild then will it cover dsrlearn.com?
if i want to provide email should i add another record of iodef along with isuewild?
Just add issue.
It will cover issuewild as well. Iodef is pretty much ignored.
openssl x509 -noout -modulus -in 0001_chain.pem | openssl md5
openssl rsa -noout -modulus -in private.pem | openssl md5
i performed these and i got same value. is anything wrong?
I don't know those commands. How many certificates are in that chain file? There should be three. If not, run
cat cert.pem chain.pem > newfile.pem
And then use the newfile.pem as certificate.
there are 3 certs in full chain
And yet there is a mismatch. I don't know. Let's wait for someone else.
do you think any problem with order?
inssllabs test
1 Sent by server
2 Extra download -> this is error it's in yellow
3 In trust store - fine
Leaf, then intermediate, then "root"
inssllabs test
1 Sent by server
2 Extra download -> this is error it's in yellow
3 In trust store - fine
So you have a missing or wrong intermediate? Where does it come from?
i don't know . how can i solve this?
If you are sending the certificate by itself it's normal to have that issue. You need to send fullchain to solve it.
The issue is... Why is your fullchain not working?
that's the issue. it's not working
i checked again with every file i found hash of 0000_chain not match to key. hash of csr , full chain , cert matches to private key hash.
what should i do?
Show that file here.
[make sure it doesn't contain the word "PRIVATE
"]
I suppose it's the LE "long" chain.
Perhaps you would do better by using the "short" chain.
Please show the command used.
openssl x509 -pubkey -in 0000_chain.pem -noout | openssl sha256
ssllabs says chain issues
You are drawing at straws.
SSL Labs will always show an "issue" (with the "long" chain - its' root is expired).
But also shows no issue with at least one path (more than enough to validate).
And what are you comparing that output to?