Do not close threads without possibility of appeal

OMG this is hilarious! I guess now I'll have to open yet another thread/topic: "Do not split topics and create new topics with misleading titles without the individuals consent"

I can only guess that you didn't like what I wrote, and then made a choice to split the topic and apply a topic name that in no way represents the purpose of my post. Stunning.

"Slow response on support thread"?

No, my post was about two things, and neither of them was that.

  1. I posted to support addressing the two ignored requests in the original topic about IRC that can be found here.

  2. I posted to support this topic about locking threads without appeal, on an arbitrary basis.

And for that, you choose to split the thread and apply a complete misrepresentation of my post as the topic name.

Just in case the "staffers" at EFF forgot, there is a great page to read here: https://www.eff.org/about

These tactics seem to be running afoul of:

The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading nonprofit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF champions user privacy, free expression, and innovation through impact litigation, policy analysis, grassroots activism, and technology development. We work to ensure that rights and freedoms are enhanced and protected as our use of technology grows.

1 Like