ACME RFC with a hash of the account_uri?

I recall reading about a proposed RFC a while back that utilized a hash of the account uri. Does anyone recall which RFC that was?

I've compiled a list of ACME RFCs below. If there are any omissions, let me know and I will edit this posting. I could not find any resource that listed them all – so I had to use the IETF site, search engines and this discourse. I am certain I missed some; I definitely missed the one with the account hash.

List of ACME RFCs

Implemented by LetsEncrypt

RFC 8555: Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)

RFC 8657: Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Record Extensions for Account URI and ACME Method Binding

RFC 8737: ACME TLS Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Challenge Extension

draft-ietf-acme-ari-08: Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Renewal Information (ARI) Extension

draft-aaron-acme-profiles-00: Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Profiles Extension

Not Implemented / Unknown

RFC 8823: Extensions to Automatic Certificate Management Environment for End-User S/MIME Certificates

RFC 8823 - Extensions to Automatic Certificate Management Environment for End-User S/MIME Certificates

RFC 8738: ACME IP Identifier Validation Extension

RFC 9115: An ACME Profile for Generating Delegated Certificates

RFC 9444: Automated Certificate Management Environment (ACME) for Subdomains

RFC 9447: ACME Challenges Using an Authority Token

RFC 9448: TNAuthList Profile of ACME Authority Token Challenges

3 Likes

I think this page lists the documents related to the IETF ACME group:

I think you might be thinking of the dns-account-label draft?

7 Likes

The proposed dns-account-01 challenge hashes the account URL:

(Edit: @petercooperjr beat me to it)

7 Likes

That's it, thanks!

I didn't think of looking through the Working Group. I kept getting search engine hits to earlier drafts that had not yet been submitted.

6 Likes

Did anyone else implement Authority Token and Authority Token Challenges? I did a while ago for STIR/SHAKEN certs but it's not clear if anyone really uses them.

1 Like

Not me. Tangent- I think we need to build a community matrix document of which Public CAs and Private CA Software support which specs. There is so much variance on this.

6 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.