I should hope you have a belief system of your own as well. Also am glad to at least be rated elaborate on the troll-o-meter scale, thank you.
I admit (again) to not being an expert in these matters so every explanation is a learning step for me. My risk vector guesses are probably all wrong, however they all exist even with all the suggestions that I am wrong because the foundation remains in question. It remains odd that LE should not want to join the ranks of [quote=“pfg, post:256, topic:264”]
other trusted CAs
but rather considers it a side goal to remain amongst the suspected CAs.
I can think of nothing further to add though the [quote=“germeier, post:255, topic:264”]
[/quote]thing was an unexpected new twist in forum protocol I had never heard of, turns out it is not relevant in this case because this was a discussion about dictating to subjects so I don’t feel to bad to have lost my talking rights with ‘germeier’. The wikipedia page does also explain that the law was created as a teaching tool and is not really an excuse to avoid reading opposing arguments.