We have multiple certs that we got at the same time, so obviously if someone was to query one they would see the rest. We host a chisel server (wraps ssh / reverse ssh in tls) on the public inet - on the chisel server side we are seeing a ton of traffic like:
TLS handshake error from IP:PORT: acme/autocert: missing server name
which we are sure are just bots and such scanning us, the traffic were seeing and have questions on is:
TLS handshake error from IP:PORT: acme/autocert: host "anotherregistered.domainbutnotthechisel.domain" not configured in HostWhitelist.
Since we run CT servers we have a pretty comprehensive list (in the low thousands) of a large amount of the CT servers and such, and none of the IP's have matched any we know of. Since were seeing HostWhitelist showing up to us this essentially ensures us that its LetsEncrypt autobot or similar - so we were planning on auto white listing these IP's for 15 days or so, then dropping the ACL until we see the IP again. Or as its highly likely after fully testing chisel we'll fw this port to only allow our subnets - we were planning on a (pre)check for HostWhitelist (although somewhat of an issue pre-checking to add a ACL before the packet hits the kernel [depending which way we go] as of the OSI layer its at). We do our auth via DNS, this is via HTTPS, and the hosts queried tend (~75-~85%) to be for domains that are not currently accessible/up.
Is this something to be concerned about, or take it more as a low level warning, or just ignore? None of our certs have been effected at all so we're basically leaning to the ignore option. Just asking as Id be happy to learn anything about it.
If LetsEncrypt would list their subnets, even if they have a /28, /30 etc and just post it as a /24 that would really help with whitelisting - but that doesnt appear to be happening anytime soon.. thought Id toss that in there ![]()